Catholic Connections and other Info
In the February 1977 John Birch Society Bulletin, Welch describes Grede as a "truly great American (p. 27)." This "great American" was a "director" of none other than the 7th Federal Reserve Bank. source link https://www.watch.pair.com/belmont.html (much more info in link)
John Birch Society (JBS)
Current JBS President, Jesuit Holy Cross Graduate
Yet another connection of the Jesuits and JBS. This man John F McManus was close, personal friends with Founder Robert Welch for many years.
“The Jesuits were busy on many fronts. The John Birch Society blossomed, aided by the Jesuits, because it served their purpose to have the attention of the Protestants shifted from the Vatican to Communism. At this time, Senator McCarthy was riding high. Publishers stopped publishing books exposing the whore and turned their attention to Communism. Some Christian publishers were bought out, others didn't want to make a stand because it would raise eyebrows.” ~Source
Now don't forget that the Jesuits used Reagan to "out" communists in Hollywood and Ron Paul lead the delegation out of Texas to get Reagan elected President of the U.S. Can you see the connection in all this? Yes, it does mean something because the connections are not few. It just keeps going. This is all I've found so far.
JBS Loved Jesuit Trained, Jesuit Puppet of Edmond Walsh SJ, Senator Joe McCarthy
"Jones was obviously excited about what McManus said about the changes that are taking place within the Society, especially the news of the big tent approach the JBS is now taking. Jones said, "I want to work with you guys, to see you grow", and McManus replied that he was "looking foreward to seeing the relationship continue".
These pictures are to quell the disinformation that this particular handsign is only used to say "I Love You". As you can see by the pictures i have provided that satanists and other elitists are flashing this exact sign. if it's sign language then why are they not doing it at a gathering for the deaf? Also, why was Clinton doing it? Did he love us too? If you believe this propaganda from pro Ron Paul groups than you are very gullible. I am NOT saying that he is indeed a satanist. But this, along with some other information I present on this page I would at least have it in the back of my mind that there may be something more to Ron Paul that is not generally known.
Picture of Gene Simmons of KISS (Knights In Satan's Service) Flashing the Sign
More Insights into the John Birch Society (JBS)
Back-Up Copy (In case it's taken Down)
Research Lead? The John Birch Society is very supportive of Ron Paul and he
is very supportive of them. John
E Schmitz is a Knight of Malta and Blackwater
Security and is related through marraige to the Bush family. Now John E Schmitz's
Father, JOHN G. SCHMITZ WAS A BIRCH
SOCIETY NATIONAL DIRECTOR
The question is, what was Ronald Reagans connection to the Vatican? Answer
Here's some other nice stuff Reagan was involved in:
FEMA And REX 84
In April 1984, President Reagan signed Presidential Directorate Number 54 that allowed FEMA to engage in a secret national "readiness exercise" under the code name of REX 84. The exercise was to test FEMA's readiness to assume military authority in the event of a "State of Domestic National Emergency" concurrent with the launching of a direct United States military operation in Central America. The plan called for the deputation of U.S. military and National Guard units so that they could legally be used for domestic law enforcement. These units would be assigned to conduct sweeps and take into custody an estimated 400,000 undocumented Central American immigrants in the United States. The immigrants would be interned at 10 detention centers to be set up at military bases throughout the country. REX 84 was so highly guarded that special metal security doors were placed on the fifth floor of the FEMA building in Washington, D.C. Even long-standing employees of the Civil Defense of the Federal Executive Department possessing the highest possible security clearances were not being allowed through the newly installed metal security doors. Only personnel wearing a special red Christian cross or crucifix lapel pin were allowed into the premises. Lt. Col. North was responsible for drawing up the emergency plan, which U.S. Attorney General William French Smith opposed vehemently.
The plan called for the suspension of the Constitution, turning control of the government over to FEMA, appointment of military commanders to run state and local governments and the declaration of Martial Law. The Presidential Executive Orders to support such a plan were already in place. The plan also advocated the rounding up and transfer to "assembly centers or relocation camps" of a least 21 million American Negroes in the event of massive rioting or disorder, not unlike the rounding up of the Jews in Nazi Germany in the 1930s.
The second known time that FEMA stood by was in 1990 when Desert Storm was enacted. Prior to President Bush's invasion of Iraq, FEMA began to draft new legislation to increase its already formidable powers. One of the elements incorporated into the plan was to set up operations within any state or locality without the prior permission of local or state authorities. Such prior permission has always been required in the past. Much of the mechanism being set into place was in anticipation of the economic collapse of the Western World. The war with Iraq may have been conceived as a ploy to boost the bankrupt economy, but it only pushed the West into deeper recession.
The third scenario for FEMA came with the Los Angeles riots after the Rodney King brutality verdict. Had the rioting spread to other cities, FEMA would have been empowered to step in. As it was, major rioting only occurred in the Los Angeles area, thus preventing a pretext for a FEMA response. On July 5, 1987, the Miami Herald published reports on FEMA's new goals. The goal was to suspend the Constitution in the event of a national crisis, such as nuclear war, violent and widespread internal dissent, or national opposition to a U.S. military invasion abroad. Lt. Col. North was the architect. National Security Directive Number 52 issued in August 1982, pertains to the "Use of National Guard Troops to Quell Disturbances." The crux of the problem is that FEMA has the power to turn the United States into a police state in time of a real crisis or a manufactured crisis. Lt. Col. North virtually established the apparatus for dictatorship. Only the criticism of the Attorney General prevented the plans from being adopted. But intelligence reports indicate that FEMA has a folder with 22 Executive Orders for the President to sign in case of an emergency. It is believed those Executive Orders contain the framework of North's concepts, delayed by criticism but never truly abandoned.
Now, FEMA is on stand by once again. Due to the terrorist attacks on New York and the Pentagon, and the ensuing "war on terror" known as Operation Enduring Freedom, the president can declare martial law under the guise of "national security."
The crisis, as the government now see it, is civil unrest. For generations, the government was concerned with nuclear war, but the violent and disruptive demonstrations that surrounded the Vietnam War era prompted President Nixon to change the direction of emergency powers from war time to times of domestic unrest. Diana Raynolds, program director of the Edward R. Murrow Center, summed up the dangers of FEMA today and the public reaction to martial law in a drug crisis: "It was James Madison's worst nightmare that a righteous faction would someday be strong enough to sweep away the Constitutional restraints designed by the framers to prevent the tyranny of centralized power, excessive privilege, an arbitrary governmental authority over the individual. These restraints, the balancing and checking of powers among branches and layers of government, and the civil guarantees, would be the first casualties in a drug-induced national security state with Reagan's Civil Emergency Preparedness unleashed. Nevertheless, there would be those who would welcome NSC (National Security Council) into the drug fray, believing that increasing state police powers to emergency levels is the only way left to fight American's enemy within. In the short run, a national security state would probably be a relief to those whose personal security and quality of life has been diminished by drugs or drug related crime. And, as the general public watches the progression of institutional chaos and social decay, they too may be willing to pay the ultimate price, one drug free America for 200 years of democracy."
The first targets in any FEMA emergency would be Hispanics and Blacks. The FEMA orders call for them to be rounded up and detained. Tax protesters, demonstrators against government military intervention outside U.S. borders, and people who maintain weapons in their homes are also targets. Operation Trojan Horse is a program designed to learn the identity of potential opponents to martial law. The program lures potential protesters into public forums, conducted by a "hero" of the people who advocates survival training. The list of names gathered at such meetings and rallies are computerized and then targeted in case of an emergency.
The most shining example of America to the world has been its peaceful transition of government from one administration to another. Despite crises of great magnitude, the United States has maintained its freedom and liberty. This nation now stands on the threshold of rule by non-elected people asserting non-Constitutional powers. Even Congress cannot review a Martial Law action until six months after it has been declared. For the first time in American history, the reigns of government would not be transferred from one elected element to another, but the Constitution, itself, can be suspended. The scenarios established to trigger FEMA into action are generally found in the society today: economic collapse, civil unrest, drug problems, terrorist attacks, and protests against American intervention in a foreign country. All these premises exist, it could only be a matter of time in which one of these triggers the entire emergency necessary to bring FEMA into action, and then it may be too late, because under the FEMA plan, there is no contingency by which Constitutional power is restored.
There are now over 600 prison camps in the United States, all fully operational and ready to receive prisoners. They are all staffed and even surrounded by full-time guards, but they are all empty.
Operation Cable Splicer and Garden Plot are the two sub programs which will be implemented once the Rex 84 program is initiated for its proper purpose. Garden Plot is the program to control the population. Cable Splicer is the program for an orderly takeover of the state and local governments by the federal government. FEMA is the executive arm of the coming police state and thus will head up all operations. The Presidential Executive Orders already listed on the Federal Register also are part of the legal framework for this operation.
The camps all have railroad facilities as well as roads leading to and from the detention facilities. Many also have an airport nearby. The majority of the camps can house a population of 20,000 prisoners. Currently, the largest of these facilities is just outside of Fairbanks, Alaska. The Alaskan facility is a massive mental health facility and can hold approximately 2 million people.
Terry Kings wrote an article on his discoveries of camps located in southern California. Here are some of his findings:
The first camp we observed was in Palmdale, California. It is not operating as a prison at the moment but is masquerading as part of a water facility. Now why would there be a facility of this nature out in the middle of nowhere with absolutely no prisoners? The fences that run for miles around this large facility all point inward, and there are large mounds of dirt and dry moat surrounding the central area so the inside area is not visible from the road. There are 3 large loading docks facing the entrance that can be observed from the road. What are these massive docks going to be loading?
We observed white vans patrolling the area and one came out and greeted us with a friendly wave and followed us until we had driven safely beyond the area. What would have happened had we decided to enter the open gate or ask questions?
This facility is across the street from the Palmdale Water Department. The area around the Water Department has fences pointing outward, to keep people out of this dangerous area so as not to drown. Yet, across the street, the fences all point inward. Why? To keep people in? What people? Who are going to be it’s occupants?
There are also signs posted every 50 feet stating: State of California Trespassing Loitering Forbidden By Law Section 555 California Penal Code. The sign at the entrance says: Pearblossom Operations and Maintenance Subcenter Receiving Department, 34534 116th Street East. There is also a guard shack located at the entrance.
We didn’t venture into this facility, but did circle around it to see if there was anything else visible from the road. We saw miles of fences with the top points all directed inward. There is a railroad track that runs next to the perimeter of this fenced area. The loading docks are large enough to hold railroad cars.
Another site is located in Brand Park in Glendale. There are newly constructed fences (all outfitted with new wiring that point inward). The fences surround a dry reservoir. There are also new buildings situated in the area. We questioned the idea that there were four armed military personnel walking the park. Since when does a public park need armed guards?
A third site visited was in the San Fernando Valley, adjacent to the Water District. Again, the area around the actual Water District had fences logically pointing out (to keep people out of the dangerous area). And the rest of the adjacent area which went on for several miles was ringed with fences and barbed wire facing inward. Also interesting was the fact that the addition to the tops of the fences were fairly new as to not even contain any sign of rust on them. Within the grounds was a huge building that the guard said was a training range for policemen. There were newly constructed roads, new gray military looking buildings, and a landing strip. For what? Police cars were constantly patrolling the several mile perimeter of the area.
From the parking lot of the Odyssey Restaurant a better view could be taken of the area that was hidden from site from the highway. There was an area that contained about 100 black boxes that looked like railroad cars. We had heard that loads of railroad cars have been manufactured in Oregon outfitted with shackles. Would these be of that nature? From our position it was hard to determine.
In searching the Internet, I have discovered that there are about 600 of these prison sites around the country. They are manned, but yet do not contain prisoners. Why do they need all these non-operating prisons? What are they waiting for? We continuously hear that our current prisons are overcrowded and they are releasing prisoners because of this situation. But what about all these facilities? What are they really for? Why are there armed guards yet no one to protect themselves against? And what is going to be the kick-off point to put these facilities into operation?
What would bring about a situation that would call into effect the need for these new prison facilities? A man-made or natural catastrophe? An earthquake, a massive poisoning, a panic of such dimensions to cause nationwide panic?
Once a major disaster occurs (whether it is a real event or manufactured event) martial law is hurriedly put in place and we are all in the hands of the government agencies (FEMA) who thus portray themselves as our protectors. Yet what happens when we question those in authority and how they are taking away all of our freedoms? Will we be the ones detained in these camp sites? And who are they going to round up? Those with guns? Those who ask questions? Those that want to know what’s really going on? Does that include any of us? The seekers of truth?
When first coming across this information I was in a state of total denial. How could this be? I believed our country was free, and always felt a sense of comfort in knowing that as long as we didn’t hurt others in observing our freedom we were left to ourselves.
Once we challenge that freedom we find out how free we really are. How many are willing to take up that challenge? Very few indeed, otherwise we wouldn’t find ourselves in the situation that we are in at the present time. We wouldn’t have let things progress and get out of the hands of the public and into the hands of those that seek to keep us under their control no matter what it takes, and that includes the use of force and detainment for those that ask the wrong questions.
Will asking questions be outlawed next? Several instances have recently been reported where those that were asking questions that came too near the untold truth were removed from the press conferences and from the public’s ear. Also, those that wanted to speak to the press were detained and either imprisoned, locked in a psychiatric hospital, murdered (through make-believe suicides) or discredited.
Why are we all in denial over these possibilities? Didn’t we hear about prison camps in Germany, and even in the United States during World War II? Japanese individuals were rounded up and placed in determent camps during the duration of the War. Where was their freedom?
You don’t think it could happen to you? Obviously those rounded up and killed didn’t think it could happen to them either. How could decent people have witnessed such atrocities and still said nothing? Are we going to do the same here as they cart off one by one those individuals who are taking a stand for the rights of the citizens as they expose the truth happening behind the scenes? Are we all going to sit there and wonder what happened to this country of ours? Where did we go wrong? How could we let it happen?
"Soviet power is a myth, a great joke. There are no spare parts; nothing is working — nothing. It's nothing but painted rust. But you, you need to keep the Russian myth alive to maintain your military-industrial complex. Your system depends on Russia being perceived as a mortal threat. It's not a threat. It was never a threat. It will never be a threat. It is a rotted, bloated cow."
Excerpt from "The Good Shepherd" and 100% true. You will find the Jesuits and Vatican have promoted this MYTH of Soviet power as a Smokescreen to get your eyes off the Vatican, the true enemy.
Promoters of this smokscreen include "Bishop Fulton Sheen" (who might be made a saint by the RCC and is the one Martin Sheen took his stage name after), Former president of Georgetown and Jesuit priest Edmund Walsh SJ, Senator Joe McCarthy (McCarthyism), Ronald Reagan (his whole career and political career was based on this), Pat Buchanan's father, The John Birch Society and of course Papal Puppet Ron Paul.
Pat Buchanan publicly endorsed Ron Paul, Alex Jones was behind his running for president and Roman Catholic Dennis Kucinich publicly endorsed Ron Paul. (Consider this a research lead.)
The Following is a testimony from someone I know who was a member of the John Birch Society
"About 27 years ago I was heavily involved in the John Birch Society. I wasn't saved yet at that time. I was beginning to see the conspiratorial nature of the banking system, the political conflicts, selling out American interests by our own "elected" officials, the "no-win" wars, and these things began to form a new picture of what was really going on.
After about 6 years the Lord got ahold of me one night and I got saved, just like you did. The real deal. Praise God. Amen. Everything changed. I began to see that the Catholics (I understood their false gospel and that they were not really Christians, quickly..) and the Mormons (also a cult I recognized) and the Pentecostals/Charismatics (I thought those were genuine though..) were running the John Birch Society. I spoke at a Birch summer camp one year and there was a Jesuit from Notre Dame there named Rice, I think. The kids were primarily Roman Catholic, though there were some who were from Christian families. The officials who had "bible" class and led in prayer were always Catholics and there was a priest there too who officiated in those things. I was really starting to have second thoughts about the whole Society and what it was really up to.
I left not long after that and provoked one of the regional officers to finally leave too, and a few others. The whole emphasis of that Society was to oppose the "Communists" who were working with the "Jews" to take over the world through their international conspiracy. I am sure you know their particular variety and angle. It is very close to what the Nazi's believed. The Vatican was, of course, never mentioned as a player at all. They just concentrated on the BEAST and left out the HARLOT."
I then asked his the name of the Jesuit that was at the JBS meetings and this was his response:
The man (perhaps not a priest afterall, doing some reading now on that..no..he turns out to be a "non-clerical cleric"...better for his imgage and subversive work no doubt) at the JBS camp I mentioned (back in 86/87) was Charles Rice, he is the son-in-law of a former head of the Law School at Notre Dame.
This link tells the story. "He is a member of the governing boards of Ave Maria School of Law, Franciscan University of Steubenville, and the Eternal Word Television Network. He is also chairman of the Center for Law and Justice International in New Hope, Kentucky, and a director of the THOMAS MORE CENTER FOR LAW AND JUSTICE in Ann Arbor." Link
I think we can safely call him a "jesuit co-adjutor". No? I'll attach a picture for you.
He was a contemporary to Theodore Hessberg, the Jesuit Chancellor of Notre Dame University. We know they are all part of the same family and work together, so that is basically, whether Jesuit or not, becomes almost a moot point in our considerations. Their priesthood is all working together in the devotion of the very same idols they uniquely serve. I think the distinction between Jesuit, Domincan, Franciscan, Archbishop, Bishop, Cardinal, Pope, all are blending into one another and we are left, in each case, with the image of a human devil working diligently for the kingdom of Antichrist. Human devils who all cry out in unison for the blood of Jesus, His saints. Who cry out for the erradication of eternal Truth, the Word of God. Amen.
Eric Phelps has stated in an interview dated 2005, that Theodore Hessburg was not a Jesuit, but "worked very close to them." This is an error. I saw Hessburg speaking at Notre Dame, in front of TV cameras carried by news reporters. He stated very clearly, and I can almost quote this verbatim in this much..."the greatest day in my life was when I became a JESUIT...." I am absolutely certain that is his testimony and no doubt countless thousands witnessed this too. I cannot imagine that he was lying on national TV about this particular subject on that particular day. It was a day the University got together to honor him specifically, and on national TV. It was at the very end of his career at N.D., so maybe he just "came clean" as he was about to retire, so to speak. Don't know. I do know that is what he said.
This is a text of Eric's interview where he states Hessburg was NOT a Jesuit: